David Cassel (destiny@wco.com)
Thu, 20 Nov 1997 12:30:33 -0800 (PST)
W r o n g s a n d R i g h t s ~++~++~++~++~++~++~++~++~++~++~++~++~++~++~++~++~++~++~++~++~++~++~++~++~++~ In May, Andrew Lewis Singer was an AOL attorney. Last Thursday he pleaded guilty to aggravated sexual battery of an 11-year-old. http://search.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/WPlate/1997-11/14/172l-111497-idx.html Authorities entered AOL's Dulles, Virginia headquarters May 30 and arrested Singer. He had apparently returned to work after a May 27 incident in which he met a teenaged on-line acquaintance at Ashburn Farm -- then asked about the 11-year-old fishing across the lake. He then committed a felony offense which included putting his hands down the boy's pants. ( http://www.aolsucks.org/list/0058.html ) Two additional counts of "taking indecent liberties" based on e-mail sent to another teenager were dropped, the Loudoun County Sheriffs Department told AOL Watch. Singer faced up to 20 years in prison, but struck a plea agreement which limited his sentence to the mid-point of Virginia sentencing guidelines. (He will serve no more than three years and four months.) The day after Singer pleaded guilty, AOL informed on-line staffers in their children's areas they'd be required to submit to a criminal background check. "People are NOT reacting well to this little surprise," one Guide confided. "I imagine they don't want too much time to be available for people to consult their attorneys." The ominous letters arrived via Federal Express. "If you do not wish to submit to a background check," it states, "we regret that we will not be able to continue to use your services in our 'Kids Only' area." "If we have not heard from you within 7 days of the date on this letter," it continues, "we will assume that you are not agreeing to a background check and will adjust your hosting dates accordingly." AOL also contacted their content partners, informing them that the criminal background checks are only for Community Leaders in kids-only areas owned by AOL -- "right now." But "once the process has been established for these AOL-owned areas, background checks will be required for Community Leaders for all sites in the Kids Only channel." Children's safety is a sensitive subject for AOL. In 1995 the FBI revealed a two-year undercover probe of child pornography trading on America Online when they raided the homes of over 120 AOL users, netting "at least a dozen suspected pedophiles," the Associated Press reported. ( ftp://ftp.crl.com/users/de/destiny/aol/ap ) But problems continue. Many AOL Watch readers noted a recent FOX News story about "the vicious internet" actually focussed on events on AOL, and two weeks ago, 20/20 aired a story about a 15-year-old boy "seduced by a child molester he met on the Internet" -- though in fact, they met in AOL's chat rooms. ( http://www.abcnews.com/onair/2020/html_files/transcripts/nmg1031b.html ) "I will continue to update you on the progress we make to create a safer online environment for all of all our children," Case told subscribers that night. Twelve days later, a Virginia man was charged with raping a 14-year-old girl he'd met through an AOL chat room. http://search.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/WPlate/1997-11/15/125l-111597-idx.html One exacerbating factor: only AOL offers their users an unlimited supply of fully-anonymous screen names. AOL is apparently ignoring the observation of the San Francisco Chronicle's Robert Rossney -- that AOL "built a system that makes it easy for predators to operate, and has then turned around and aggressively marketed it to prey". (http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/chronicle/article.cgi?DD22231.DTL:/chronicle/archive/1995/09/21) In 1996 Internet Underground magazine ranked Steve Case as the third most subversive person on-line, saying he was "responsible for luring millions of people into naughty chat rooms" -- but apparently, AOL is even trying to generate traffic for their $2.00-per-hour games -- frequented by many young adults -- by promoting them as a "Singles" club. ("MEET YOUR DREAM partner in WorldPlay," AOL's welcome screen announced recently -- "Real people. Real fun.") AOL is also marketing themselves toward teenagers through a new alliance with People magazine. ("Log on for hot buzz," the web site states, "on today's grooviest stars and styles; real love advice; scarily true horoscopes, and more." http://www.teenpeople.com ) "Millions of teens already regard AOL as their home online," the CEO of AOL Networks announced in a press release. ( http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/971119/america_online_1.html ) But how concerned is AOL about their safety? Even with AOL's Parental Controls set for teen access, images titled "Butt is it art," "Sexy Models, silly shoes," and Bananarama" are distributed through the "Intimate Images" section of AOL's "Heckler's Online" area. http://www.hecklers.com/artsy/intimate/full_size/InImBIA2.htm http://www.hecklers.com/artsy/intimate/full_size/InImHOv1.htm http://www.hecklers.com/artsy/intimate/full_size/inimfwf2.htm The soft-porn pictures are also displayed on the Heckler's Online web site. "Can you say 'Hypocrite?'" one AOL Watch reader asked. "It may not be hardcore, but I don't think too many parents want their kids seeing these images." (Coincidentally, when accessing the images through the Heckler's Online site, browsers receive an ad for "Excite.") AOL's current Terms of Service even include a caveat specifically allowing AOL to refuse to monitor any of their boards and chat rooms. ("AOL, Inc. may elect, at its sole discretion, to monitor some, all, or none of AOL's public areas for adherence to the TOS.") One user reports that recently complaints sent to AOL's Terms of Service address were deleted, unread. Another subscriber notified AOL that their home phone number had been posted as the source for "Naughty Oklahoma T-Shirts," yet the angry phone calls -- and death threats - - continued. ( http://www.nytimes.com/library/cyber/law/112097law.html ) His lawyer told the New York Times that "apart from its own internal instincts," AOL had no legal incentive to act. Yesterday's Milwaukee Journal Sentinel tells a similar story. AOL received a court order requiring them to divulge the identity of the man who posted a female subscriber's phone number, giving her hobby as "one night stands." "[S]he received 'dozens of unwanted and disturbing phone calls at work from unknown men from across the United States'," the paper reports. (http://www.techserver.com/newsroom/ntn/info/111997/info16_8658_noframes.html) Meanwhile, several mail-order bride firms are using AOL as their business address. "The U.S. government...requires the Thai American Introduction Service to inform you that it is RISKY to marry a stranger that you have only known for a short time" reads one service's disclaimer -- though their main page announces that the service "is generally for 'marriage minded people'," (though not limited to "the marriage minded...") ( http://www.thaisdc.com/immigration.html ) Another introduction catalog includes an important caveat. "You must be at least 16 to be published," it announces in flashing red letters. ( http://members.aol.com/asiavenus/publish.htm ) But an atmosphere of unaccountability pervades AOL's system. "It occurs to me that I am a stalker," another AOL user states. "The woman I am stalking is a friend -- a close friend -- and from time to time I let her know I am stalking her." The user is the Washington Post's Richard Cohen, examining the disturbing implications of AOL's Buddy List feature. Being someone's buddy is "creepy," his female friend concluded. "That person always knows when you are online." http://search.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/WPlate/1997-10/26/011l-102697-idx.html AOL now hopes to export that uneasiness to the internet. "Inherent in this buddy technology is the notion that any user who is not specifically blocked from access to another person's log-on status will also be able to peruse the list and message at will," Wired News noted-- using the word "invasiveness" ( http://www.wired.com/news/news/business/story/7697.html ) The technology will be bundled with new versions of Netscape's browsers -- and AOL's rationale was clear. One analyst told the news service that "you cannot understate the potential for ad revenue on these little instant messaging windows when you're sending around hundreds of millions of messages per day." But AOL's pursuit of ad revenues at the expense of privacy concerns Susan Scott, Executive Director of TRUSTe, an on-line privacy organization. ( http://adage.com/interactive/articles/19971020/article3.html ) Scott told Advertising Age that when she gave AOL her credit card number, it was so they could bill her. "It wasn't so they could buy my information from database companies." Her conclusion? "It's a gross violation of privacy." The magazine also cites a Business Week poll in which only 1% of adult respondents were "very willing" to share personal and financial information so on-line ads could be targeted more specifically. ( http://www.businessweek.com/1997/40/b3547025.htm ) A whopping 88% said they were "not very willing" or "not willing at all" -- but AOL has implemented the policy anyways. Ironically, many of AOL's advertisers are just as unhappy about AOL's unwillingness simply to reveal the number of people viewing their ads. "Even clients for whom the information is promised have to beg and scream for it," one analyst told MSNBC, "and then they get it three months after the fact." ( http://www.msnbc.com/news/122229.asp ) AOL's greed may backfire on them. Frequent advertisements for their Visa card promise there's no annual fee for the card -- and a Worth magazine columnist noticed AOL doesn't charge interest on cash advances until the end of the billing cycle. A friend of the columnist obtained a cash advance for his full line of credit -- and then placed it in an interest-bearing checking account. The card's automatic-pay feature allowed him to return the full amount to AOL after weeks of collecting interest. The accumulated interest after one year: $1000. ( http://www.worth.com/articles/Z9711U02.html ) "Revenge is at hand," the columnist wrote -- "Not that AOL is likely to leave this loophole open long after reading Worth." THE LAST LAUGH AOL's Netscape's Instant Messenger feature didn't impress Jeff Schult, the special projects director for CyberZone Internet. "The 'Find a Buddy' by e-mail feature doesn't seem to work," he told AOL Watch. "It says I can't use the feature because I'm not registered, and directs me to register...then tells me that I'm already registered." After registering, he was sent five URLs for additional information. Only two of them worked--and one went to a page for "Feedback". "I figured Netscape wouldn't partner with you if the service sucked," his feedback read, "but I guess I was wrong." David Cassel More Information - http://www.aolwatch.org/faq1b.htm http://aolwatch.org/porndex.htm http://www.wco.com/~destiny/case-jux.htm http://www.inside-aol.com/news/mono.htm http://www.wco.com/~destiny/0077.htm ~++~++~++~++~++~++~++~++~++~++~++~++~++~++~++~++~++~++~++~++~++~++~++~++~++~ Please forward with subscription information and headers. To subscribe to this list, type your correct e-mail address in the form at the bottom of the page at www.aolsucks.org -- or send e-mail to MAJORDOMO@CLOUD9.NET containing the phrase SUBSCRIBE AOL-LIST in the the message body. To unsubscribe from the list, send a message to MAJORDOMO@CLOUD9.NET containing the phrase UNSUBSCRIBE AOL-LIST. ~++~++~++~++~++~++~++~++~++~++~++~++~++~++~++~++~++~++~++~++~++~++~++~++~++~